<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> International Geosynthetics Society
IGS home page IGS home page IGS home page IGS home page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geosynthetics International: Vol.8, No. 3, 2001

To gain access the full text of the papers below, you must become a member of the IGS - if you are already an IGS Member, please to the Geosynthetics International Journal Archives in the Members Only section of the site.


Technical Paper by S.A. Aiban and S.M. Ali

 

NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE-SABKHA AND -SAND INTERFACE FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS USING PULL-OUT TESTS

 

ABSTRACT: Sabkha soil is abundant along the Arabian Gulf and Red Sea coasts and is a problematic soil due to its acute water sensitivity and chemical aggressiveness. In many situations, it is required to improve the load carrying capacity of sabkha, and the use of geotextiles was found appropriate. The objectives of this research were to study frictional characteristics of sand-geotextile-sand and sabkha-geotextile-sand interfaces and to compare the pull-out resistance of locally available nonwoven geotextiles taking into account different test parameters. An experimental setup was developed to conduct the pull-out tests. These test results have indicated the existence of three stages of deformation in the geotextile under pull-out testing, which ultimately lead to the slippage of the entire geotextile strip. The use of the pull-out plate reduces the effects of the lateral earth pressure developed on the front wall of the pull-out box and ensures that the free geotextile is kept within the box and, thus, under the required confinement throughout the test. The pull-out tests results indicated that high tensile strength geotextiles require a large pull-out force in the case of the sand-geotextiles and interface, whereas the least extensible geotextile requires the maximum pull-out force in the case of the sabkha-geotextile-sand interface. It was also found that the geotextile surface texture and extensibility are the two main factors, in addition to the mass per unit area of the geotextile, in the case of sabkha-geotextile-sand interface.

 

KEYWORDS: Sabkha, Sand, Geotextile, Pull-out, Residual state, Slippage, Soaking.

AUTHORS: S.A. Aiban, Associate Professor and S.M. Ali, Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia, Telephone: 966-3-860-2272, Telefax: 966-3-860-2879, E-mail: saiban@kfupm.edu.sa.

DATE: Original manuscript submitted 18 July 2000, revised version received 9 April 2001, and accepted 12 April 2001. Discussion open until 1 January 2002.

REFERENCE: Aiban, S.A. and Ali, S.M., 2001, “Nonwoven Geotextile-Sabkha and -Sand Interface Friction Characteristics Using Pullout Tests”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 193-220.


Technical Paper by N. Hytiris, D.J. McKay, and P.S. Addison

A CANOPY FLOW EQUATION FOR EROSION CONTROL GEOSYNTHETICS

ABSTRACT: A novel experimental test programme for erosion control geosynthetic mattings, i.e., geomats, is described. Using a laser Doppler anemometer, the velocities have been examined within the flow field at the fluid-geomat interface. Initial analysis of the test results has lead to a modified log-law equation for the downstream flow velocities above the geomat. This equation has the same form as canopy flow equations used in meteorology to describe the velocity profiles above vegetative canopies in the atmospheric boundary layer. The canopy flow equation for erosion control geotextiles is discussed herein.

KEYWORDS: Erosion control, Geomat, Laser Doppler anemometery, Hydraulic, Velocity distribution profile, Log-law, Canopy flow, Roughness coefficient.

AUTHORS: N. Hytiris, Senior Lecturer, Department of Energy and Environmental Technology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, Telephone: 44/141-331-3686, Telefax: 44/141-331-3370, E-mail: N. Hytiris@ gcal.ac.uk; D.J. McKay, Doctoral candidate, Department of Energy and Environmental Technology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, Telephone: 44/141-331-3590, E-mail: djsmckay@hotmail.com; and P.S. Addison, Senior Lecturer, School of the Built Environment, Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, Telephone: 44/131-455-2302, Telefax: 44/131-455-2239, E-mail: P.Addison@napier.ac.uk.

DATE: Original manuscript submitted 18 July 2000, revised version received 9 April 2001, and accepted 12 April 2001. Discussion open until 1 January 2002.

REFERENCE: N. Hytiris, D.J. McKay, and P.S. Addison, 2001, “A Canopy Flow Equation For Erosion Control Geosynthetics”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 8, No.3, pp. 221-232.


Technical Paper by A.L. Li and R.K. Rowe

INFLUENCE OF CREEP AND STRESS-RELAXATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT ON EMBANKMENT BEHAVIOUR

ABSTRACT: The effects of viscous behaviour of geosynthetic reinforcement on both the short-term and long-term performance of basally reinforced embankments over inviscous soft foundations are investigated. The construction of embankments reinforced with both viscous reinforcement and inviscous reinforcement is numerically simulated to identify the magnitude of creep and stress-relaxation of reinforcement under both limit-state and working stress conditions and the consequent effects on the stability and deformations of the system. The effects of viscoelastic properties of four reinforcement products made of polyester, polypropylene, and polyethylene are examined. It is shown that the viscous behavior of geosynthetic reinforcement can decrease the short-term stability, and the creep of geosynthetic reinforcement can significantly magnify the long-term shear deformations of the foundation soil. The isochronous stiffness can reasonably represent the mobilized reinforcement stiffness at the end of construction. The mobilized reinforcement stiffness and force are examined and the design  considerations are discussed.

KEYWORDS: Reinforced embankment, Geosynthetic reinforcement, Creep, Viscoelasticity, Soft soil, Stability.

AUTHORS: A.L. Li, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7K 3N6, Telephone: 1/613-533-6000, Ext. 77558, Telefax: 1/613-533-2128; E-mail: li@civil.queensu.ca; and R.K. Rowe, Professor, Vice Principal (Research), Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7K 3N6, Telephone: 1/613-533-6933, Telefax: 1/613-533-6934, E-mail: kerry@civil.queensu.ca. Corresponding author: R.K. Rowe.

DATE: Original manuscript submitted 20 March 2001, revised version received 3 July 2001, and accepted 6 July 2001. Discussion open until 1 January 2002.

REFERENCE: Li, A.L. and Rowe, R.K., 2001, “Influence of Creep and Stress-Relaxation of Geosynthetic Reinforcement on Embankment Behaviour”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 233-270.


Technical Note by M.A. Knight and S.M. Kotha

MEASUREMENT OF GEOTEXTILE-WATER CHARACTERISTIC CURVES USING A CONTROLLED OUTFLOW CAPILLARY PRESSURE CELL

ABSTRACT: The present paper describes the use of a controlled outflow capillary pressure cell for the measurement of geotextile-water characteristic curves. Fine sand with a known soil-water characteristic curve and a geotextile column drainage experiment were used to validate the controlled outflow cell. The controlled outflow cell was also used to measure drainage geotextile-water characteristic curves for one, three, and six vertically stacked nonwoven geotextile specimen layers. Test results indicate the following: (i) the controlled outflow cell can measure a complete nonwoven drainage geotextile-water characteristic curve with a water entry pressure of 50 mm; (ii) vertical stacking of the nonwoven geotextile has little influence on the geotextile-water characteristiccurve; and (iii) a geotextile-water characteristic curve can be measured in less time when compared with Klute’s method. Test results also indicate that ASTM D 854 may be used to determine the specific gravity of the nonwoven geotextile.

KEYWORDS: Geotextile-water characteristic curve, Unsaturated flow, Geotextile, Nonwoven.

AUTHORS: M.A. Knight, Assistant Professor, and S.M. Kotha, Masters candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1, Telephone: 1/519-885-1211, Ext. 6919, Telefax: 1/519-888-6197, E-mail: maknight@uwaterloo.ca and smkotha@engmail.uwaterloo.ca, respectively.

DATE: Original manuscript submitted 17 February 2000, revised version received 10 January 2001, and accepted 29 January 2001. Discussion open until 1 January 2002.

REFERENCE: Knight, M.A. and Kotha, S.M., 2001, “Measurement of Geotextile-Water Characteristic Curves Using a Controlled Outflow Capillary Pressure Cell”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 271-282.